Celebrity Chef Bobby Flay’s Divorce Battle Heats

Life outside the kitchen is getting sticky for celebrity chef and restaurateur Bobby Flay, as he is locked in a contested divorce battle in Manhattan Supreme Court with his estranged wife, Stephanie March. March is no stranger to the courtroom setting, having played a prosecutor on Law & Order: SVU on and off for the past 15 years. But with bitter accusations and aggressive legal positions, it looks as though she and Flay’s divorce proceedings will be far more dramatic than any of her Law & Order: SVU plots. The prominent accusation thus far is that Flay has been guilty of adultery more than once during the couple’s 10 year marriage, including a 3-year affair with his assistant (an allegation which Flay has neither confirmed nor denied at this point). It remains unclear whether March had any involvement in a stunt earlier this month against Flay which involved a banner with the word “cheater” flying overhead as Flay received a star of the Hollywood Walk of Fame. But while the salacious details of an adulterous relationship can often become a hot button issue in divorce cases, does it really have an impact on the ultimate outcome of the proceedings?

Georgia still recognizes fault grounds for a divorce, and adultery is one of the 12 potential fault grounds that are considered under Georgia law. But aside for it being a legal ground for a divorce in Georgia, allegations of adultery can also play a central role in other components of a divorce case. For example, if a spouse is accused of committing adultery, and the Court determines that the adultery was the direct cause of the divorce, then that spouse is completely barred from receiving any alimony. However this statutory rule is often not helpful if the adulterer also happens to be the primary breadwinner – as in Flay’s case – as he or she would not have been a candidate for alimony anyway.

Another way that adultery can factor into a divorce case in Georgia is if one spouse depleted marital funds or assets in pursuit of the affair. Judges in Georgia have the discretion to divide the marital estate in an unequal manner (i.e., not 50/50) if the Court believes that one spouse is more deserving of more than 50% of the assets. Therefore, if one of the parties spent large sums of money on an adulterous relationship, the Court can and often will take that into consideration when dividing up the marital estate.

Finally, and an issue close to most attorneys’ hearts, is the issue of the attorney’s fees and expenses that each spouse incurs as a result of the divorce proceedings. If one spouse’s adultery contributed to the cause of the divorce, the Court can take that into consideration in awarding attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation in favor of the scorned spouse. So if Stephanie March is able to prove her allegation that Flay not only had affairs, but had a 3-year long affair with his assistant, he’s probably going to need to sell a lot of burgers in order to keep up with the costs of this divorce battle.

Divorce: Discovery

As we continue to look at Dick and Jane and the topic of divorce, recall that the process is underway and we have moved past the temporary hearing into the discovery phase. This month and next, we will look into the discovery process and determine the information that each side will need to have to move the case into a posture for settlement or a final trial.

From Jane’s standpoint, the discovery process will center on two areas, the first of which will be personal to her but ultimately of little long term benefit to the Court and the second of which will be critical to resolution of the case by settlement or trial. Unfortunately, too many litigants become obsessed with the former and minimize efforts on the latter.

First, Jane is undoubtedly going to want information on the subject matter of Dick’s affair. There is no issue that this subject is relevant to the issue of divorce, but not to the extent that Jane might think. One’s emotion side drives this quest for information and it is not uncommon for someone in Jane’s position to seek answers to these questions:

  1. Who is she?
  2. When did it start?
  3. How long as it been going on?
  4. Is Dick intending to stay in a relationship with this person or was it a “fling?”
  5. Why did this happen?

While many of these questions are critical for Jane to resolve in order to move past the emotional issue of the affair, many of these answers will have little relevance in Court. Judges are very accustomed to hearing about misconduct and tend to try keep focused on the incomes of the parties and assets to be divided. The Court will want to be aware that an affair occurred, but usually only needs to know:

  1. When did the affair start?

    If the affair is post-separation, it did not cause the divorce unless it can be shown that the affair or relationship was contemplated or “in the works” prior to the separation. If the affair was 5 years before the separation and ended as quickly as it happened, it probably is not the cause of separation either.

  2. Has Dick used marital funds in furtherance of the relationship?
  3. Is the relationship ongoing and does it have the potential to impact the children?

It is not uncommon for one spouse to ask the Court for an order prohibiting Dick from keeping the children away from individuals with whom he was romantically involved. For many years, the Court would enter these prohibitions as a matter of course, particularly in cases where an affair had occurred. However, a series of appellate decisions in Georgia have consistently held that a blanket restriction on contact with members of the opposite sex or individuals with whom a party is in a romantic relationship is overly broad and unenforceable unless there is a specific finding that the situation or introduction would have a harmful effect on the children. Some appellate examples include:

  • Ward v. Ward, 289 Ga. 250, 250–51(1), 710 S.E.2d 555 (2011) (holding that trial court abused its discretion in amending visitation provision in final decree to provide that mother “ ‘shall not have any overnight male guests while the minor children are present’ ” because the provision would prohibit the mother “from having visitors with whom she has no romantic relationship”);
  • Arnold v. Arnold, 275 Ga. 354, 354, 566 S.E.2d 679 (2002) (holding that trial court abused its discretion in prohibiting children “from any contact with a certain named friend of Wife” when there was “no evidence that the relationship between Wife and her friend was or will be harmful to the children, or that they ever engaged in any inappropriate conduct in the presence of the children”);
  • Brandenburg v. Brandenburg, 274 Ga. 183, 184(1), 551 S.E.2d 721 (2001) (holding that trial court abused its discretion in prohibiting father from exercising visitation with children in the presence of his girlfriend, even if the two should marry, when there was no “evidence that such relationship had or likely would have a deleterious effect on the children beyond that normally associated with divorce or a parent’s remarriage”);
  • Mongerson v. Mongerson, 285 Ga. 554, 556(2), 678 S.E.2d 891 (2009) (holding that trial court erred in prohibiting husband “from exposing the children to his homosexual partners and their friends,” which was “an arbitrary classification based on sexual orientation” but holding that trial court’s decision to prohibit children’s exposure to paternal grandparents was not an abuse of discretion when evidence showed that grandparents “had been physically and emotionally abusive of the children”), overruled on other grounds by Simmons v. Simmons, 288 Ga. 670, 706 S.E.2d 456 (2011).

The second area of discovery which is far more critical to the case and is often minimized by the party is the financial aspects of valuing Dick’s company. In an upcoming blog, we will devote an entire discussion to the process of valuing a marital business. In the context of this discussion and the initial discovery requests, Jane needs to be highly focused on the operation of the business more than the financial outputs. Most often, a party will request information about the numbers, for example:

  1. Profit and loss statements;
  2. Financial statements;
  3. Tax returns;
  4. Bank records; and
  5. Balance sheets.

This information is certainly sufficient for generating a value of the company. In fact, if limited to this information there would be little point in Dick and Jane hiring opposing financial valuation experts. On this information alone, the generally accepted standards of the valuation industry would cause most valuation experts to generate a result that is not substantially different from one another. However, the financial records only tell a portion of the story. For reasons we will discuss in greater detail, it is far more important that Jane gain an accurate picture of the following:

  1. Largest customer and percent of revenue;
  2. Market share data, including industry competitors;
  3. Covenants not to compete among key employees;
  4. Previous value statements of enterprise v. personal goodwill;
  5. Executive compensation packages; and
  6. Recurring v. Non-recurring revenue items.

This information will be critical in “moving the needle” up or down and will generate the adjustments made by a valuation expert. This is where some subjectivity can enter the process and Jane’s attorney will need to be armed with information to bolster her expert and attack the expert retained by Dick.

Next month, we will look at the discovery process from Dick’s standpoint. Dick’s major concern should be balancing the provision of information against his own self-interest.

What Happens If I Die Without A Will

Leslee Champion Hungerford - Attorney in Marietta, GAMany wonder what will happen to their belongings if they die without a will. If you die without a valid will while residing in the State of Georgia, you are said to have died “intestate.” In order to determine who will receive your property if you die intestate, the State of Georgia has established a number of laws (known as “intestacy laws” or “laws of intestate succession.”) Only assets that would have passed through your will are affected by intestate succession laws. Usually, this includes only assets that you own alone, in your own name. Many assets will not be affected by intestate succession including jointly held real property, life insurance proceeds, or funds in an IRA, 401(k) or other account in which you have designated the beneficiary by contract.

So the big question is who gets what? If you are married at the time of your death and you die without a will, what your spouse gets depends on whether or not you have living descendants – children, grandchildren, or great-grandchildren. If you do not have any descendants, your spouse will inherit all of your intestate property. However, if you do have descendants, they and your spouse will share your intestate property equally, except that your spouse’s share cannot be less than one-third (1/3). So, if you have one child with your spouse, they each will receive fifty percent (50%) of your estate. If you have four children and a spouse, your spouse will receive one-third (1/3) of your estate and the four children will share equally the remaining two-thirds (2/3).

If you die with no spouse but have children, your children will equally receive an “intestate share” of your property per stirpes. Per Stirpes is a Latin word meaning “by the branch.” An estate of a decedent is distributed per stirpes if each branch of the family is to receive an equal share of an estate. What this language means is that if you have two children and five grandchildren who survive you, then each of your children will receive a 1/2 share and the grandchildren will receive nothing. If, however, one of your children predeceases you and is the parent of three of the grandchildren, then the surviving child will receive a 1/2 share and each grandchild will receive a 1/6 share (in other words, the deceased child’s 1/2 share will be divided equally among the three children who have survived the deceased child: 1/2 divided by 3 = 1/6 each).

If you die without a spouse or children, your estate will then go to your parents. If you are not survived by parents, the next in line to inherit are siblings, followed by nieces and nephews, grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins in that order.

Will the State get my property? People often ask if they do not have a will does that mean the state will get their property. The answer is, very unlikely. If you die without a will and don’t have any family, your property will “escheat” into the state’s coffers. Because the laws are designed to get your property to anyone who was even remotely related to you (i.e. those long lost cousins you haven’t seen in years), it is very unlikely that your property will ever escheat to the state.

The moral of this story is that everyone should have a will in place. Call or email us us to get started on your estate planning today!

(770) 405-0164 or info@odellneal.com

Pamela Anderson Seeks a Restraining Order Against Husband

Pamela Anderson and Husband Rick Salomon’s relationship has certainly seen its ups and downs. Anderson has married the professional poker player twice, filed for divorce three times, and each has sought an annulment from the other on at least one occasion. However, Anderson’s most recent divorce filing on February 11, 2015 was accompanied by a request for a temporary restraining Order for the purpose of protecting her safety. Anderson alleged in her Restraining Order Petition that “[Salomon] is controlling, physically, verbally and financially abusive.” She continued that “[h]is anger towards me has increased and escalated, and his attempts to contact me both directly and indirectly, is disturbing my peace. I respectfully request that the court grant my request for a restraining order that [Salomon] be restrained from contacting me, either directly or indirectly, and a spousal support award”. After reviewing the allegations of her Petition, a Los Angeles Judge granted Anderson’s request for a Temporary Restraining Order against Salomon and scheduled a Court date for April 3.

Domestic violence allegations such as these have been given greater exposure over the past year due to other high profile incidents, most notably those related to NFL running back Ray Rice and the ensuing backlash against the NFL for its admitted mishandling of the incident. The NFL has placed a renewed focus on making domestic violence a serious discussion topic and has waged a commercial campaign to spotlight the issue. However, in Rice’s case, the victim did not seek immediate help, and is still in a relationship with Rice. In Anderson’s case, however, immediate action was taken, which highlights one important and effective option a victim has to secure immediate protection through the legal system.

In Georgia, a person who has been the victim of violence or the threat of violence may file a Petition for an Emergency Protective Order and present his/her allegations to the Court. The alleged abuser would not be given notice of this hearing due to the emergency nature of the issue. If the Court grants the Emergency Protective Order to the accuser, as was the case for Anderson on March 13, the opposing party is immediately served with a copy of the Order, prohibited from contacting the accuser, and a follow-up hearing is scheduled for shortly thereafter. At the follow-up hearing, each side will present his/her case to the court and will be permitted to call any witnesses he/she has available. If the Court finds in favor of the victim, the Court will extend the Protective Order for a longer period of time, typically at least twelve months. As part of that extended protective Order, the abuser is not permitted to come within a certain number of feet of the victim, is not permitted to contact the victim either directly or indirectly, and is not permitted to possess a firearm.

The Court is also permitted to award child support and/or spousal support to the victim at a protective Order hearing. This is particularly important because often victims are fearful to seek this type of court issued protection because they are financially dependent on their abuser. Thankfully for Anderson and Salomon, they do not have children together so the Court need not deal with those issues at their April 3 protective Order hearing. While it remains to be seen what the Court will do with Anderson’s allegations once Salomon gets to present his side of the case, it appears to be safe to say that the third time is not going to be the charm for these two.

Divorce: Temporary Hearing – What does Dick need?

As we continue to look at Dick and Jane and the topic of divorce, recall that the process is underway. As we move through the process, we are going to examine each phase from the perspective of Dick and from the perspective of Jane. Last month, we looked at the temporary hearing from Jane’s perspective. This month, we approach the same hearing from Dick’s standpoint.

Dick’s primary concerns moving forward are as follows:

  1. Maintaining contact and a relationship with his children;
  2. Making sure that the funds he earns support Jane and the children but don’t prohibit him from providing for them either;
  3. Minimizing the financial impact of the divorce and avoiding funding a “war chest” for the attorneys;
  4. Shielding his marital indiscretions from the case.

Just as Jane should view all of her goals at the temporary hearing through the lens of family stability, Dick should have the same approach.

On a temporary basis, he may be willing to concede that Jane is the primary physical custodian but he should ensure joint legal custody. Dick may have some subject areas of legal custody over which he would like to have final decision making authority. For example, he may feel strongly about public v. private school, certain medical treatments of the children or their religious upbringing. The Court may not decide final legal custody on a temporary basis, but if Dick does not make these areas known at this phase, he will lose out on his ability to do so later.

The parenting time and visitation schedule will be an important opportunity for Dick to demonstrate his role as a parent and Father. If he bites off too much time and cannot keep it up due to work conflicts, he will play right into Jane’s arguments. If he takes too little time, he runs the risk of becoming a “Disneyland Dad” or guy that just sees his kids every other weekend, but is not really involved in their lives. The best outcome would be for Dick to try and obtain visitation time that blends weekends and weekdays so as to give him quality time and involvement with the children. Schedules like Thursday after school until returning to school on Monday morning one weekend and Thursday after school until returning to school on Friday morning the next weekend are becoming increasingly popular with the Courts. The schedule is predictable and structured and minimizes back and forth for the children. In addition, the children are exchanged through the school, rather than in a parents driveway (which can be tense and lead to disputes).

Financially, Dick needs to step up at the temporary hearing and support the family, but he must be prudent in doing so. The temporary order should be structured so that it is just that, temporary. Most Judges and Courts are going to expect Jane to seek some level of employment. If she is receiving all of the funds that she needs or wants on a monthly basis, she may not be inclined to push for work. From Dick’s standpoint, he would be best to volunteer to pay certain monthly expenses (mortgage, utilities, car note and insurance, etc…) directly rather than just giving the money to Jane. On a temporary basis, all of the foregoing is commonplace. This creates a feeling that this structure is not permanent and will be revised on a final basis. On the contrary, if Dick were just to pay over a sum of money each month in gross support, a precedent could be created for a final order.

Attorney’s fees and the payment of Jane’s attorneys will be a major struggle for Dick. If he cuts off funds to Jane completely, she cannot obtain adequate representation and the case will bog down. On the other end of the spectrum, if she has or receives a large amount of funds, she may be inclined to start a major battle.   Dick should concede that some fees may be appropriate (particularly in light of his misconduct problem) so as to appear reasonable, but should push that additional attorney’s fees be borne by the parties individually or be paid equally utilizing marital assets as the source. Some Judges will state that it is very necessary that both spouses (regardless of fault) need to “feel the pain” of the divorce process if they choose to keep fighting. The goal of every Judge is for the parties to settle the case themselves. If one side is paying 100% of the costs on both sides of the fight, the non-paying side has no incentive to ever end it.

Next month, we will look at the discovery process from Dick and from Jane. We will focus on what each side needs to gain by way of information, particularly as it relates to the valuation of the marital business.

What’s in a Will?

Leslee Champion Hungerford - Attorney in Marietta, GAWhat’s in a Will? Why do I need one? A will or last will and testament is a legal declaration by which a person, the “testator,” names one or more persons to manage his or her estate and provides for the distribution of his or her property at death. In other words, it is a legal description of what you would like to happen to your property after you die.

What Property Is Included In A Will?

Most generally, the will distributes a decedent’s real property (land) and personal property (everything else). The property you own at your death is called your “probate estate” and consists of all property owned by you at the time of your death that is not otherwise distributed under the terms of a contract or by operation of law (I.E. life insurance with a death beneficiary designation, pension and retirement accounts (like IRAs and 401(k)s) with a death beneficiary designation, property owned by you and some other person as joint tenants with right of survivorship, and bank and brokerage accounts with pay-on-death or transfer-on-death designations). Probate property includes your tangible possessions like clothing, jewelry, household furniture and furnishings, cars registered in your name, real estate titled in your name (or in your name and the name of some other person as tenants in common), bank accounts registered in your name with no pay-on-death designation, and stocks and bonds held in a account in your name with no transfer-on-death designation.

Who Can Receive Property From A Will?

There is no specification as to whom property must be left to in a Will and the testator may direct the distribution of his or her probate estate in any manner that is not contrary to Georgia law or public policy. That is, a Will is legal even if it leaves everything to a complete stranger and nothing to a spouse or other relatives. (However it should be noted that any surviving spouse and minor children will be entitled to property from your estate for their support and maintenance for a period of 12 months.)

What Is Required To Make A Will Legal?

Georgia law requires the following for a valid will:

Capacity To Make A Will: A person must meet certain minimum requirements in order to make a will. In Georgia, the legal age to make a Will is fourteen (14) years of age. A person must also know what property he or she owns and must have a decided and rational desire as to the disposition of his or her property. The testator must also know “the objects of his bounty” (i.e. his children, spouse, family, etc.). Finally, the testator must know the contents of the will he is signing.

Freely and Voluntarily Execute The Will: The will must be executed freely and voluntarily by the testator. A will that is made under pressure or coercion is not valid.

In Writing: A will must be written in order to be valid. The will does not have to be typewritten or on any special paper. It can be handwritten. A will may not be oral in Georgia. For example, a videotape of someone expressing his wishes on videotape would probably not be a valid will under Georgia law.

Signed By, Or At The Direction Of, The Maker Of The Will: The will must signed by the testator (person making the will) or someone else in the presence of and at the express request and direction of the person making the Will. That is, if a person cannot sign his or her name (either for an inability to write, or a physical handicap) he or she can make a mark to indicate the intent to sign, or someone can sign the person’s name if directed to do so.

Properly Witnessed: The will must be attested and signed in the testator’s presence by at least two competent witnesses. The witnesses must be at least fourteen (14) years old and must sign their own respective names on the will. Each witness must be competent to witness the will. Under Georgia law, a witness is “competent” if the witness can distinguish right from wrong and can testify in a court of law regarding the facts surrounding the execution of the will. The fact that a witness is a criminal does not render the witness incompetent to witness a will. While it does not affect the validity of the will or the competency of the witness, if there are only two witnesses to a will and one of those witnesses is a beneficiary under the will, the witness loses any rights to property the witness would have received under the will. Therefore, no one who is a beneficiary under a will should witness that will.

Why Do You Need A Will?

Many people wonder if they need a will. That answer depends on whether the individual would like a say in how their property is distributed upon their death. With a will, you decide how your estate will be distributed and you may dispose of your property as you choose. Without a will, your estate is distributed to your heirs, who are determined in accordance with state law. That being said, whether you are married, single, have minor children or own even a nominal amount of personal assets or property, you should have a will.

Benefits of a having a Will include the following:

  • With a will, you have control as to which members of your family receive any part of your estate and how much they receive. Without a Will your estate is distributed to your heirs in accordance with the law.
  • With a will, you have the ability to name an “Executor” to take care of matters and divide the estate according to your wishes. Without a Will an “Administrator” will be named by the court and you have no say as to who this person will be.
  • With a will, your executor can be given full powers to sell your property and manage it without requesting permission of a court. Without a will, your heirs must petition a court for the administrator to be granted these powers.
  • With a will, you can nominate the person whom you want to be guardian of your minor children. Without a will, the choice of guardian will be determined by a court.
Fulton County Judge Grants Rapper Ludacris Full Custody Of 13 Month Old Daughter After Year Long Court Battle

The 14 month legal battle between rapper Ludacris – whose legal name is Chris Bridges – and Tamika Fuller over custody of their 13 month old daughter, Cai Bella Bridges has reached a dramatic conclusion. The lawsuit started in December of 2013, with Ludacris filing a Petition in Fulton County Superior Court seeking a legal legitimation of his daughter. Fuller filed a counterclaim requesting that she be awarded a sizeable sum of monthly child support from the rapper.

The final trial took place in January of 2015. During the proceedings Ludacris cited Fuller’s poor parenting over her other child from a previous relationship as a primary reason for him to be awarded primary custody of Cai Bella. Fuller countered by revealing that Ludacris had requested that she have an abortion and bribed her in an effort to get her to terminate the pregnancy. Fuller also accused Ludacris of manufacturing his current marriage in an effort to appear more stable. The Court also heard from a Court appointed Guardian ad Litem, who had conducted an independent investigation of both parents. Following all of the testimony, Judge Doris Downs awarded Ludacris primary physical custody and granted the parties joint legal custody.

What remains unclear is whether Ludacris will still be ordered to pay child support to Fuller. Under a previous temporary ruling in the case, the rapper was ordered to pay $7,000/month to Fuller. However, based on the Court’s final custody Order granting him primary custody, his attorneys may be seeking to eliminate his child support obligation all together, or possibly even order Fuller to pay child support to him.

If they do pursue this option, there is no guarantee that they will prevail. It is possible in Georgia for a custodial parent to still be required to pay child support to the non-custodial parent. Georgia law allows the Superior Court Judge to exercise his or her own discretion to determine whether the best interests of the child would be served by money being paid to the noncustodial parent to allow for proper visitation. Such an anomaly generally only occurs when the incomes between the parties are so disparate that it would be unfair to the child to have such radically different living environments between the two households. This legal loophole in Georgia is likely Tamika Fuller’s only chance at this point at getting any money out of the wealthy rapper.

Divorce: Temporary Hearing – What does Jane need?

As we continue to look at Dick and Jane and the topic of divorce, recall that the process is underway. As we move through the process, we are going to examine each phase from the perspective of Dick and from the perspective of Jane.

For this month, we will look at the temporary issues from the perspective of Jane. Jane’s primary concerns moving forward are as follows:

  • Maintaining stability & a routine for the children;
  • Making sure she has adequate funds to pay household expenses;
  • Making sure she has adequate funds to get through the costs of the divorce, including amounts to find out about assets;
  • Discovering information about the extent of Dick’s affair

In preparation for the temporary hearing, Jane should focus most on the children and the stability of the family. By presenting the case through that lens, all of her concerns above can be met. On a temporary basis, Jane would push for a determination that she has primary physical custody and joint legal custody of the children, with her having final decision making authority over legal decisions affecting the children’s healthcare, education, religion and general welfare. The Courts use a form document called a “Parenting Plan” to lay out the provisions controlling custody and visitation. It will be most important for Jane to come up with a realistic schedule for the children so that they can meet their academic and extracurricular requirements with minimal disruption. The Court will want to start the parties on a schedule that looks more and more like things will look when the parties are completely divorced. Jane may want to push for an order from the Court preventing Dick from introducing the children to any new love interests. On a temporary basis, a mutual order of this sort would not be out of the question.

From a financial standpoint, Jane will need to prepare a budget. The budget will document all of the household and children’s expenses. The budget is known as a Domestic Relations Financial Affidavit. The Court will look at the budget and determine the amount of money needed for Jane and the children and order that Dick pay the same. The Court can order that certain expenses be paid directly (like a mortgage) and that other funds are to be given to Jane for the payment of expenses.

Alimony is becoming increasingly harder and harder to obtain. Women of all walks of life are expected to work and contribute to the household expenses. On a temporary basis, the best argument for Jane to make is going to be to lay out a plan for the future. If Jane needs to go back for job training or schooling, she should present a plan to do so and ask for an award of money to pay for the same. The Courts are going to look much more favorably on Jane if she can present a logical plan to return to work as opposed to simply making a request for funds every month.

On the issue of attorney’s fees, Jane needs to outline the plan for litigating the case and, specifically, the amount of funds needed to get the case to a settlement posture. Courts are very receptive to the use of reasonable attorneys’ fees in order to get a case resolved and not subjected to a final trial. If Jane attempts to make the temporary hearing all about Dick’s affair and appears out for “vengeance” the Court is going to shoot her down. A Judge is not going to be inclined to allow Jane funds to go on the warpath. Jane will need a reasonable amount of money to use the discovery process to get a handle on the parties’ assets. One major issue will be determining the value of Dick’s new company (we will devote an entire blog post to this subject later). If Jane can outline a fee proposal designed to get this information, the Court would be inclined to grant the award.

It might be difficult for her to contemplate, but Jane will need to wrestle with the decision of selling the house. If the parties have equity in the house, a sale might be the only way to access the funds in order to divide them. This is particularly true if the parties do not have sufficient funds elsewhere to offset the value of the house. It might be tempting for Jane to enter into an agreement whereby she keeps the house and the equity in it and allows Dick to keep other assets in exchange. However, Jane should caution against becoming “house poor” or in a situation where she has a high, unaffordable mortgage payment and her savings is inaccessible due to being in the equity in the house. Jane will need to consider the needs of the children for stability and structure and determine if the house can or should be sold.

Next month, we will look at the same issues from Dick’s perspective. Dick must be very cautious about setting a precedent for payments and managing damage control.

Justin O’Dell & Leslie O’Neal Are Rising Stars

Rising Stars 2015 Super LawyersJustin O’Dell and Leslie O’Neal have been named Rising Stars for 2015 by Georgia Super Lawyers! No more than 2.5 per cent of the lawyers in Georgia are selected each year. For Justin O’Dell, this is his third year being selected and the first for Leslie O’Neal.

Good for Cobb

Good for cobbPrior to the SPLOST vote in November 2014, Justin O’Dell spent countless hours dedicating himself to the merits of its value to Cobb County. He knew that the continuation of the SPLOST would mean improvements in transportation, public safety and quality of life for all residents of Cobb. As co-chair of the effort to Secure Cobb’s Future, Justin understood that the needs of many should outweigh the negative few.

As a continuation of his efforts to secure a great future for residents of Cobb, Justin O’Dell has joined with other business leaders in the community in a grassroots initiative that will carry the torch for more progress. As Vice-Chair of the “Good for Cobb” Steering Committee, Justin will serve the community in promoting improvements through development and projects. Bringing the Braves to Cobb was just the beginning of many good things to come for the citizens of Cobb. From the courtroom to the community, Justin is committed to serving clients and community.

MDJ_good_for_cobb